Letter to the Editor,
For 135 years, water and wastewater have been
public utilities in Holyoke, operated by the city
without profit, for the benefit of the citizens.
The decision for public operation was made at a
time when women couldn’t vote and children worked
14hr days in the mills, yet the city fathers were
progressive enough to see the social value of
public control of water and wastewater. The
political capital to make this decision came from
the labors of the first generation of industrial
workers in the city, many Irish arriving here
after the Great Potato Famine in the 1840’s.
These men worked for a generation digging the
canals of Holyoke with picks and shovels, and the
women and children worked long hours in the
mills, and in 1871 moved to take control of their
water system as a public trust.
Last night, the Board of Public Works (BPW) voted
to violate that public trust by approving a
20-year privatization contract with Aquarion,
owned by Kelda Group, a UK-based multinational
water company eagerly privatizing water and
wastewater systems throughout New England. Mayor
Sullivan’s grandfather worked his whole life for
Holyoke’s Department of Public Works, and yet
last night, Sullivan’s appointees on the Board of
Public Works sold out the city and the current
workers to a private, for-profit corporation, one
that drove their workers in Bridgeport to a
strike vote in Nov. 2003. The unanimous vote to
privatize came as a shock to the dozens of
residents who have attended many meetings and
written pages of public comment in opposition to
and critical of the plan to privatize.
The city has given no consideration to optimizing
current public operation, but Bill Fuqua of the
Holyoke BPW has said that the BPW could do the
work, and has stated that the City Council still
has the option of requesting that the city
continue to run the sewer system without being
privatized. HDR Inc., one of the consulting
firms that drew up Holyoke’s plans for
privatization, worked with the city of San Diego
to create an award-winning public optimization
plan that saved the city $90m over 5 years, and
yet our Mayor and the BPW has not even done an
optimization study to see what more efficient
public operation might look like.
I’m a member of Holyoke Citizens for Open
Government(HCOG) and we are concerned that this
decision-making process has been rushed and that
the contract itself is flawed, and numerous
questions remain unanswered. City Councilor
Helen Norris and others have repeatedly asked the
BPW what the real costs to Holyoke would be if
the city decided to reverse privatization and no
satisfactory answers to this have been
forthcoming. We call for greater transparency
and full public disclosure of the real costs of
privatization, not numbers from Malcolm-Pirnie
cooked to favor the Mayor’s plan. HCOG wants to
make sure that the residents of Holyoke
understand that the city's ratepayers do have the
option to fund a public project to clean up the
river.
The decision to privatize is now in the hands of
the Mayor and the City Council. We call on the
Mayor not to sign the contract with Aquarion.
Citizens have not been fully informed, and we
demand that a postcard be sent to all ratepayers
informing them of this momentous decision, and
that public comment be extended a full six weeks
after the mailing, and that a public hearing be
held in the middle of this period to fully inform
residents.
Recent BPW meetings have seen the largest
attendance ever, according to Mr. Fuqua, and yet
this public opposition to privatization has not
swayed the board. We demand that the City
Council vote against any rate hike or
appropriation of funds until continued public
operation has been given full-consideration. We
ask the Holyoke City Council to hold a public
hearing on this issue.
We have a website on this issue: http://water.homestead.com
I commend your newspaper on its coverage of this
story, and hope you will print this letter.
Thanks for your consideration.
Yours for public wastewater,
Brian Oelberg
95 West Glen St.
Holyoke, MA 01040